Lou Vlahos is a first-rate tax lawyer with FarrellFritz, a NYC law firm. He publishes a regular and excellent blawg on the taxation of for closely held companies and their owners. His latest post is about Biden’s tax plans. The link is:
The Urban Institute and the Brookings Institute have just published a new 16-page study that addresses the impact of Internal Revenue Code section 199A. The link to the study is https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/sites/default/files/publication/159744/tax-incentives-for-pass-through-income.pdf At some point within the next few days, I will e-mail readers a post summarizing the key points in the study.
Sometimes a profitable business may want to share its profits with its owners; can’t readily do so with payments in the form of cash payments; but can do so by distributing company property to them that will have immediate value to them. The post under the link below provides a brief but excellent discussion of this situation. Briefly: Multi-member LLCs and other entities that are taxable as partnerships can make these payments tax-free; entities taxable as C and S corporations can’t.
Under the link below is an article I’ve just published in Tax Notes, a daily federal and state tax information service. The article is entitled “Section 199A Restructuring: The Process and its Risks.”
Here’s the link:
The post under the link below summarizes a statement by the IRS commissioner about IRS plans for extensive additional guidance about the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 before the end of this year. Importantly, the commissioner makes no reference to guidance under section 199A, a provision of tremendous important to every LLC owner and lawyer. Maybe this means that, at least for a while, no more section 199A guidance will be forthcoming.
As many of you know, my fields of expertise are (i) complex LLC law and tax; and (ii) section 199A, including, especially, section 199A restructuring. If you have questions in either of these fields, please feel free to give me a call.
The excellent post under the link below addresses an issue that can be important for many start-up LLCs—namely, the issue of when a business ceases to be a business in formation and becomes an active trade or business for start-up deduction purposes. The issue was addressed and resolved in a recent Tax Court decision discussed in the post.
Here’s the link:
The new post under the link below is not about LLC law or tax, but it’s the best short discussion of tax issues in selling S corporations I’ve ever seen. Few LLCs make S elections, but many should.
A significant number of single-member and multi-member LLCs are S corporations, and many LLCs ought to be S corporations in order to maximize their IRC section 199A pass-through deductions. The post under the link below provides a brief but useful discussion of what an entity that ought to be an S corporation can do if it inadvertently allows its S election to terminate.
I recently published an article in the New Hampshire Bar News concerning the availability of section 199A deductions to New Hampshire lawyers. Since the article applies also to lawyers (and also to other professionals) in states besides New Hampshire, I’ve included a copy of the article at the link below:
A basic question for section 199A experts is when a business should elect to be a C corporation rather than a pass-through business. Below in quotes are the title, a listing about the author, and the first couple of paragraphs of an article in Tax Notes about C corporations and the Accumulated Earning Tax.
Now I Am a C Corp: What About the Accumulated Earnings Tax?
Cory J. Stigile
In this article, Stigile provides background on the accumulated earnings tax and explains the steps corporate taxpayers may be able to take if the government begins to more actively audit and litigate the accumulation of profits.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act reduced the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent, providing an additional significant incentive to conduct business through a corporation. Shareholders may be tempted to keep additional earnings in the corporation, rather than declare a dividend or pay compensation subject to an additional layer of tax at the individual level. The accumulated earnings tax (AET) and other code provisions discussed below may now play a bigger role in curbing excessive accumulation of profits and some types of passive income in corporations without the payment of dividends. There are several steps taxpayers may take to prepare should the government begin more actively auditing and litigating these issues.